Government should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
vocabulary:
priority for funds/where to spend more money/invest more finance/allocation of financial resources
medicine/health care research/
environment/climate change
.
.
.
.
environment:
comprehend and take care of the biggest problem of global warming
example: a huge amount of money is used to understand melting of ice caps
ecosystem and human existense are inter related, damage done is to be assessed so that deterioration can be reverted
to address unforseen threats, additional funds are required
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
human health:
human health is a dominating/pressing/crucial/critical problem
environment recovery is doubtful, but human health issues are clearly visible
previous breakthroughs have shown that there are immense positive results in human life, health and eradication of many fatal disease
example: current Covid scenario has clearly shown that research in health field needs to be further strengthen
riddle for environment issue is already solved, usage of renewable fuel and control on industrialization would reverse the deterioration
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Introduction:
A school of thought is of the belief that more funds should be invested in environment studies rather than health research.
I personally opine that this is a wrong approach and should be rejected.
or
Though some people opine that environmental issues deserve more funds in comparison to health research, it is a fact that human health is a more pressing concern.
My essay will further elaborate why allocating funds to human health research instead of environment study is the right choice.
or
No doubt, environmental issues are critical in today’s world and should be addressed. However, it cannot be done on the expense of human health research.
Biggest priority, on any given day, would be human health.
.
.
Body paragraphs
There are many reasons why spending money on ………… is a better option.
or
Many benefits can be associated to the funding resources on ………
or
Many reasons can be given in favour of allocating financial resources to…..
.
.
Moreover, there are many other reasons that cannot be ignored.
or
In addition to these reasons, many other prominent reasons also need attention.
or
Consideration of …………. is also crucial.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.

=====================================================================
sample answer from Navneet

It is being suggested that government should allocate more money to enforce the research in the medical field as compared to the environment. I completely agree with the given notion, as I believe that medical needs of people are urgent, while any damage to environment takes ages to happen, thus immediate researches should be done for the upgradation of medical science.

To commence with, there is a deluge of arguments to prove that medical research needs more money. The most pivotal one is that there are several untreatable diseases, which are increasing the rate of mortality. While researches will help to find out the required treatment methods to combat such diseases. Similarly, not everyone can afford the expensive treatment plans, which makes them deprived from the available medical facilities. Thus, researches will help in finding such medicines and treatment plans that will be affordable to all, irrespective of their financial conditions. Hence, research in medicines will make it easier to fight with the diseases and make the nation healthier.

Moreover, there are several reasons that why less money is required for the researching the environment, but more for medical. The most primary reason is that environmental changes takes decades to put detrimental impact on the creatures on the earth. To elucidate, due to global warming, glaciers are melting though with the help of researches over time scientists became able to stop the impact of global warming, it will take centuries to impact the earth if will be left untreated. However, if the treatment for diseases will not be available then it will harm the human beings in an accelerated pace. For instance, if more money was not being spent on medical research, doctors will not be able to find the vaccine to deal with the pandemic, from which the whole world is fighting these days. Certainly, the aforementioned statements made it vivid that more funds should be provided for the medical research.

In summary, due to the crucial need for the new updates in the field of medicine requires more money and manpower to conduct researches, however environmental conditions could bear the delays.

==========================================================================

Sample answer from Savreet

Disbursing funds appropriately is an astute process to drive a country towards success. Governments should do it wisely. It is advisable to spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment. I strongly believe that this is quite a successful and practical approach as medical research is urgent while environmental research is gradual.
To begin with, there are a plethora of reasons to justify the cause of spending more money on medical research. Bringing in light the demographic shift of the past century, it can be observed that improved medical research has resulted in longer life spans for humans. Other than that, now several fatal diseases can be completely cured and infections can be prevented as well as healed. For example, until the early 20th century hospitals were full of people with blood poisoning contracted from a cut or a scratch, and doctors could do little for them but wait and hope. It was in 1928 when Penicillin heralded the dawn of antibiotic age. Although Egyptians have a long history of treating wounds with molded bread which used to serve the purpose of antibiotics, it was the research in the medical field that bestowed the world with the first true antibiotic. This discovery led to the introduction of antibiotics that greatly reduced the number of deaths from infection.
Moreover, there are several reasons for spending less money on the environment as compared to medical research. However, the focal one being the sedating pace of pernicious effects of environmental changes on the organisms. For example, in the early 1980s NASA first observed an ozone hole over Antarctica and it was obvious that it is impossible to cure in a year or two. As anticipated, it took 40 years to close it and by the end of 2020 it is perceived as completely refurbished.
On the other hand, COVID-19 halted the world and it was urgent to invent the antidote. Keen research in the medical field has successfully granted vaccines to the world and managed to normalize the situation to a greater extent. If the funds were not deflected to invent a cure and make it in everyone’s reach, it would have engulfed multiple folds of the lives we have lost due to the virus. Certainly, the above reasons make it clear that it is dire to spend more money on medical research.
To summarize, due to the unforeseen emergencies and human health being the dominating factor, governments should spend more money on medical research as environmental conditions can wait.